(12-11-2011 07:12 PM)Rose of Shushan Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:For one thing not "all" things have been fulfilled. So, since that is the truth, then my point and that verse still stands true.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
That's exactly correct. HE did not, repeat, DID NOT, come to destroy or to do away with. And HE says HE came to fulfill. All to often people think that means he fulfilled everything in the old testament. And that is not what he says in either of the above verses or anywhere for that matter. HE did fulfill "ALL" the Prophecies of his coming and Sacrifice and resurrection. But that in no way implies he came to do away with the Law (very bad translation. Torah does not mean law. It means Instruction)
Well, first you say that not all things have been fulfilled and then in the last paragraph you said that He fulfilled all the prophecies.So which one is it?
So you say in your last paragraph that he fulfilled the prophets but yet the Law was not done away with.The verse I showed you from Luke was spoken by Jesus after His Resurrection
Luk 24:44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.
Luk 24:45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,
Luk 24:46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:
Luk 24:47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Thus the prophets are fulfilled and the Law is done away with.This doesn't mean we now ignore the Law but we recognize that it has been superseded by a better one.If you insist that we are still under that Law then we must be bound to all its precepts.That includes men marrying their brother's widows, stoning Sabbath breakers and adulterers etc etc.Is that really what you think we should be doing Mark?
Also I'd be interested to know what you think still remains to be fulfilled.
Quote:You are also correct when you say "Jesus was speaking to those under the Law there, and the Old Covenant was still in force since Jesus had not died yet."
Why is it you think that all that was at Mt Sinai were Jews? It clearly says it was a "mixed multitude" and included Stranger, sojourners, and aliens. WE ARE ALL UNDER THE "INSTRUCTIONS" ( not the curse of the law) OF GOD. That whole premise is ludicrous in my opinion.
The instructions of God at this moment in history are for us to obey Jesus and listen to Him.The instructions of Moses to the children of Israel were the conditions attached to the Sinai Covenant.God did however promise a New Covenant, not like the old one which the people broke.(Jer 32).Jesus came and ushered in that New Covenant.He gave instructions and told us of the Way. The Sinai Covenant contained the shadows of the reality which is the one in Christ and now that Jesus has come why should we still obey commandments that related to a covenant which is no longer in force?
Like I told you in another post, if you want to obey Sinai Law then your High Priest is not Jesus but an earthly one.
Heb 5:1 For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins:
Heb 5:2 Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity.
Heb 5:3 And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins.
As you see there the High Priest according to the law was a mere man and as such had to offer sacrifices for both himself as well as the people. This was in the past however since now
It is Jesus who is our High Priest.
Mark you see to want us to still be under the obligations of the Mosaic Covenant but can you not see that al that became obsolete once Christ came into the world,suffered and died.What would be the use of getting priests to offer sacrifices for us when the final sacrifice has already been made.
Heb 7:22 By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.
Heb 7:23 And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death:
Heb 7:24 But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood.
Heb 7:25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.
Heb 7:26 For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens;
Heb 7:27 Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.
Heb 7:28 For the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity; but the word of the oath, which was since the law, maketh the Son, who is consecrated for evermore.
There are two different covenants Mark and we cannot be in both.The first was just a shadow as the following verses illustrate and the second is said to be better and based on better promises.
Heb 8:4 For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest, seeing that there are priests that offer gifts according to the law:
Heb 8:5 Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.
Heb 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
Heb 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
So you say in your last paragraph that he fulfilled the prophets but yet the Law was not done away with.The verse I showed you from Luke was spoken by Jesus after His Resurrection
Also I'd be interested to know what you think still remains to be fulfilled.
This isn't hard to understand. What HE clearly meant was, HE, Yeshua did fulfill all that was Prophesied about HIM and concerning HIM from Moses to the Prophets, in regards to #1 His Coming #2His sacrifice #3 His Resurrection and Ascension to the right hand of the Father. If those things that were Prophesied about concerning the above, didn't happen , then HE would not be the Messiah. Prophecies and Law (Torah.. Instructions) are not the same thing.
And you ask me what hasn't been fulfilled. Well we can start with the absolutely obvious things, there are many more;
Heb 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Heb 8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
Heb 8:11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
Heb 8:12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
Heb 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
For one thing the KJV gets this way wrong, which is how so much of this is sooo misunderstood. However, lets just take what it says here in the first place and pretend that KJV got it right.
Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
Heb 8:11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest
If this is what you are saying the New Covenant is then I ask you..Are the Laws (Torah)so into your mind and so wrote on your heart, that like it says ..And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest
That means that when we have this "New"(incorrect translation) Covenant we will no longer have to teach anyone because we will all know It (The Torah) And all men will Know HIM. So, there will be absolutely no need to have to Evangelize or witness to people in regards to the Good New's and the Messiah, because we will all know HIM and HIS Torah.
Also "that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me."
Notice here that HE says concerning ME. There is way more to the New Covenant the just things concerning Yeshua.
If all thing's were truly fulfilled then we would have no need for these debates because we would know. And part of this New Covenant is in regards to there being no Sin anymore basically because the Law(Torah) will be wrote on our Hearts and minds so , it would be impossible to go against HIS Torah. Truly things can not be completely fulfilled till after the 1000 year reign, in which by the way, Yeshua will be our high priest here on earth.
Like I told you in another post, if you want to obey Sinai Law then your High Priest is not Jesus but an earthly one.
Heb 7:28 For the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity; but the word of the oath, which was since the law, maketh the Son, who is consecrated for evermore.
Heb 8:1 Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
Heb 8:2 A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.
Notice here "the word of the Oath" what is the Oath? it says the law maketh men Priest which have infirmity(weakness). The Oath which came after the Torah was the promise of a Messiah our True High Priest.
There are two different covenants Mark and we cannot be in both.The first was just a shadow as the following verses illustrate and the second is said to be better and based on better promises.
Why do you think we can't be in both? Where does anything ever say that when another Covenant is given we no longer have the others? There are more then just 2 Covenants and we are heirs to all the promises and Covenants made since the beginning. To think that our Great and Mighty God didn't know what HE was doing when HE made any and all Covenants and promises to us is plain crazy !! You seriously think our GOD changes HIS mind??HE is a Unchanging Unchangeable Totally righteous GOD.