SeekGod.ca Discussion Forum

Full Version: Aramaic Primacy, Hebrew Primacy & Dump the Greek
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Many within the Hebrew Roots movement are being taught to reject the original Greek manuscripts of the NT, in favor of Aramaic or Hebrew primacy, or a combination of the two. While we have the thread Greek is the Language of the NT > http://www.seekgod.ca/forum/showthread.php?tid=4 , it seemed a good idea to discuss this, in this manner. 6799

We have seen some lists out on the internet which declare that there are scholars and researchers like "Howard Gordon, Charles Cutler Torrey, Robert Balgarnie Young Scotts, James Trimm, Paul Younan, Andrew Gabriel Roth, Christopher Lancaster" and claims of hundreds of others who are reportedly providing a myriad of evidence and documentation to show the impossibility of a Greek primacy for the New Testament. Sign0138

The above list is actually propagated by some on various websites as accurate. Originally, it appears to come from a sacred name/kabbalist/Hebrew roots/charismatic/anti-Christian/anti-Jesus source. That is, mashiyach.com.

It is common for the kabbalah and talmud to be found within the writings of Two House/Ephraim proponents. It is also common to be found among those claiming to be messianic or claiming to believe in Yeshua, the Hebrew name for Christ. But, many also make that claim when using Yahshua, or many other non Biblical variations, which are used because Jesus is viewed by them as a Greek pagan name which leads to Him being declared a greek pagan god. Icon_new_shocked

First, though, the elimination of the trust of the NT by claiming the over 5000 manuscripts in Greek, are all wrong. And "the Greeks" who wrote these things did so from a Greek mindset instead of a "Hebraic mindset." And we have those in HR leadership who are going to tell us what things really mean. Or so they say. Smilies-34791

Looking at the list of "scholars and researchers", we see:


Howard Gordon > What research or scholarly work that he has done, is an unknown at this point as the only source in that context appears to originate from the mashiyach.com website and others regurgitating the undocumented information.

Charles Cutler Torrey > Aramaic primist - translated the Gospels [1933] by retroverting from the Greek back to Aramaic. Which Aramaic? None of the dialects of the first century exist today. Using the Greek manuscripts and translating to Aramaic is not proving aramaic primacy. It proves one can translate from the Greek to any language, which has been done for years.

Robert Balgarnie Young Scotts > Hebrew primacist --Was a clergyman of the United Church of Canada [a blend of Presbyterian and Methodist] and a hymn writer. He argued that the book of Revelation was originally written in Hebrew. Arguing does not make it so.

James Scott Trimm > James Trimm is most well known for his Hebraic Roots Version [HRV] of the Bible - he plagiarized the NT and used corrupt manuscripts such as the Shem Tov, Hebrew Matthew and changed the Names of God, Jesus, and Lord to the Sacred Names. See: http://www.seekgod.ca/topichrministries.htm#james

Mr Trimm took prepaid pre-orders for the complete HRV four-five years before it was published. Then those who had ordered it never received the version and were told that the money was for a "donation", not for product. Some people spent a good sum having ordered multiple copies for their congregrations at $50-60 each. Smack

Although some finally received their version, it was of inferior quality, with grammar and spelling issues. Which should not have been a surprise as James Trimm is known to be inept at spelling. He also came out with a NT commentary based on his NT HRV that was loaded with kabbalah. Mr Trimm has many kabbalistic teachings via his email forums as well. Eyerub

He has "translated" several pseudographical books [Apocrypha] which he accepts as inspired scriptures. Mr Timm has no degrees in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek, but promotes himself as "Dr" Trimm with a "doctorate" from a diploma mill. He has never provided proof of either a BA or a Master's Degree which are mandatory prerequisites for a doctorate in any field of study. According to language scholars that have spoken with him, he is not familiar with either Hebrew or Aramaic. Th_thtrans

Mr Trimm's private life is blatantly unscriptural. Pornographic material has been seen in his home by credible witnesses, and he and his wife had a soap opera forum promoting an ungodly life style. At one point, Mr Trimm was involved in an adulterous affair, all the while promoting and writing his teachings. At this time he was also begging for money for his family via the internet. Mr Trimm admitted to the adultery via his email forums, but the full story was disclosed on another forum by one of his associates at that time. It can be read here, which includes the legal removal of Mr Trimm from his Beit Din:
Busted

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_...sage/14317

Christopher Lancaster >Aramaic pimacist whose real name is Raphael Christopher Lataster, which name he has gone back to using in favor of the English pseudonym of "Christopher Lancaster" since 2007. Lataster is a financial planner, investor, pharmacist, philanthropist, justice of the peace, and sometime author. He is also the web master for the Aramic Peshitta Bible Repository which promotes the Lamsa Peshitta. He has no degree in any linguist or language venues, but has written a book "proving" that the entire NT was originally written in Aramaic.

From a degreed language and linguistic scholar referring to Lataster: "A general trend I perceive is that he seems unaware of general linguistics, principles of comparative linguistics and Bible translation techniques. Thus sometimes his examples seem far-fetched. He does not indicate any awareness of factors in Bible translation into other languages, like critical textual evaluations and standard procedures for determining between textual variants.

Lancaster seems unaware of language history and the standard science of Historical and Comparative Linguistics, which has amassed a considerable literature and techniques related to the languages he refers to and the claims he makes. He exhibits a singular tunnel vision that views all of history in terms of Aramaic. This leads him to accept, apparently, the ethnocentric and imperialistic attitude of the Assyrian church that Aramaic was the original Semitic language!"

http://orvillejenkins.com/reviews/lancasteraramaic.html

Other critics argue that Lataster's work has little scholarly support, and that his many qualifications are irrelevant in the field of scholarly Bible study. His "verification" comes by way of Andrew Gabriel Roth.


Paul Younan > Aramaic primacist - is an Assyrian and translator of the Aramaic Bible on peshitta.org - a website dedicated to the collection, preservation and dissemination of religious materials in the Aramaic language. Mr Younan believes that the original NT was written in Aramaic. As a lifelong member of the Assyrian Church of the East, he believes that by preserving the Aramaic of the Peshitta, he is preserving the words as they were spoken by Jesus and His disciples. quote: "Many of our Assyrian people in America unfortunately are unaware of the key which we hold to the Scriptures, and especially to the New Testament, through the Aramaic language, the language which our Lord Jesus Christ spoke and preached during His mission on Earth." [Jesus is >] Mar Eshai Shimun, Patriarch of the Assyrian Church of the East."

The Peshitta website has the Paul Younan Bible, George M Lamsa Bible, Murdock and Etheridge Bible translations, and the Khabouris Codex there, as well. This website attempts to show how the Peshitta points out the "problems" of the Greek NT and "solves" them.
Sign0164

Andrew Gabriel Roth > Aramaic primacist - was raised in New York as a Reform Jew, and took an early interest in Hebrew prayer and liturgy. He believes that the NT was originally written in Aramaic and has written his own English translation from the Peshitta. He states that the Greek NT has lost the original understanding because of the inability of the Greek to accurately convey the true meaning of the text. Sign0095

Andrew Roth denies the trinity. In his book "Ruach Qadim", he goes into great detail of the use of kabbalah within the writings of the NT and specifically Paul. Foot

Andrew Roth's Aramaic skills have been questioned by the Aramaic scholars, other than the group at the Peshitta website. Mr Roth does not appear to have any language credentials, so this is no surprise. He translated the word "sheep" in the NT as defined as males only. His "Maryah" definition finds strong disagreement within the credentialed Aramaic community as well [outside of the Messianic venue]. It is no wonder that his work is so readily and eagerly accepted by other non-scholars and fellow kabbalists like James Trimm.


Christopher Lancaster, Andrew Gabriel Roth, Paul Younan and others have published a book called "Was the New Testament Really Written in Greek?" This book deals with suggested Greek Bible contradictions, Greek variants, split words (polysemy), mistranslations, idioms, Aramaicisms, Semiticisms, Biblical poetry in the Peshitta Bible, and includes featured articles dealing with Koine Greek and Biblical Greek comparisons, Semitic syntax in the Greek NT, and Bible codes that are found in the Aramaic Peshitta.

Bible codes are merely kabbalistic gematria. That means the occult.
7863
Claimed Proof Texts of Aramaic or Hebrew Primacy

Many posit that the topic of whether the New Testament has a Greek or Hebrew/Aramaic origin has been addressed by many scholars, whom they claim, are providing all manner of publications and proofs concerning their speculation about Hebrew and Aramaic primacy. The claimed "proof texts" routinely given of examples are: Khabouris codex, Peshitta, Muenster, ShemTob, and DuTillet, which are all declared to clearly show that it is impossible that the early followers of Jesus were "Greek thinkers, writers or speakers." 89

Apparently Hebrew and Aramaic primacists can't make up their mind whether the original manuscripts were Hebrew or Aramaic so do a trade off and say they are sister languages. Which doesn't hold with their beliefs--those of Hebrew primacists and those of aramaic primacists. They are not the same languages. A Hebrew book is not the same as an Aramaic book.
Th_emotionsshrug

The Peshitta: Many want to believe that the NT was first written in aramaic. They refer extensively to the Estrangelo Aramaic, or Syriac versions and to the Peshitta version translated by Dr. George M. Lamsa. Most reputable language scholars reject the notion of the Syriac original and instead state evidence shows the Syriac versions were translated from the Greek manuscripts. There are numerous dialects and aramaic has changed significantly over the years, in each dialect.

Evidence against the Syriac being the original language of the New Testament:

First, Aramaic has continually changed over the centuries of its existance, with unique dialects in Palestine, Samaria, Galilee, etc. Edessan aramaic or eastern aramic, was different than the western dialects. There were 100-200 years between the time of the apostles and the Syriac, which brought even more changes.

Odessa, the focus of Syriac and its major New Testament versions was not even evangelized, much less established in Christianity, until after A.D. 116, which was long after the NT was written. Lamsa's Peshitta is inaccurate. He used unidentified aramaic texts to supply missing portions of the texts he chose, and in some places merely copied from the KJV. The forms of aramaic he used are not the aramaic from the time of Jesus.

It should be understood that the Aramaic spoken today, called the Eastern group of dialects, is different from the Aramaic spoken by Jesus Christ, which was the Western group, a branch that is considered extinct.


Muenster, ShemTob, and DuTillet > are known as the Hebrew Matthews. While discussed here > http://www.seekgod.ca/forum/showthread.php?tid=22

I will just add this information for clarity on this subject. From post #37 >The claim concerning original Hebrew manuscripts or translating from original Hebrew manuscripts is not academically accurate. The supposed Hebrew Matthews or Shem Tob Matthew are from the 1400-1500 range CE. Precisely, ShemTob or Shem Tov is dated 1380, while DuTillet and Muenster are about 1550. Together they make up the "Middle Ages Matthews" but, they are very different, and that is one of the ironies.
Interview
Khabouris codex

Khabouris codex > The Khaburis Codex was from the 12th century or slightly earlier. So it is foolish at best to be included to "prove" Aramaic primacy of the NT. It does nothing of the sort. It was supposedly based on a supposed second century text which is not in existance. Therefore unprovable.

Discussions concerning it show the source to be,
Quote:"Assyria, (probably Nineveh),... Correspondence from 1986 shows that the British Library experts had dated it paleolographically to about the twelfth century, and this has now been confirmed by a research team assembled in America in 1995, as well as by carbon dating by the University of Arizona in 1999 (giving the date range 1000-1190 AD)....The codex has been used by a number of modern-day Christians for religious-healing or holistic purposes, and soon after 1970 MacDougald himself transcribed from the present manuscript the text of the Beatitudes in Christ's Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5.3?12), and used these to develop a course of contemplative study named "Emotional Maturity Instruction", .... A revived form of this course is still taught annually by Dr M. Ryce ..." http://www.invaluable.com/auction-lo...1-c-asqlamewkh.

Quote:The Khaburis Codex ( alternate spelling Khaboris , Khabouris) is a late and unremarkable Syriac manuscript of the New Testament. The Khaburis Codex is the complete Peshitta New Testament containing 22 books, in comparison to the Western New Testament Canon which contains 27 books. The missing books are II Peter, II John, III John, Jude and Revelation. It has been carbon-dated to the twelfth century, which is confirmed by palaeography. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khaboris_Codex


An example of the Kharboris codex-- John 1:1-5
Chapter 1
1.At the very beginning (brashet) there was willed action (milta), and the willed action (milta) then was by God (Alaha), and God was that willed action (milta).
2. This beginning (brashet) was by God.
3. All was by Him and without Him not a single thing came into being out of that which was.
4. From Him there came into being a perfect life (khayi) and this perfect life (khayi) became light (nohra) unto all men.
5. And this light (nohra) out of darkness caused light, (manhar) and darkness did not overcome.

Chapter 2:15-17 15. He made Himself a cattle whip (prigla) out of strands (khaolii) and drove everything of theirs (kulhoun), the sheep and the oxen, out of the Temple, and turned over the tables of the money-changers; their money He poured out.
16. To those that sold doves He said, "Remove these from here, and do not make of the house of my Father a house of commerce."
17. And His disciples remembered that which was written, "Ardor for Your house arouses me."


The Kharboris Project was glombed on to by none other than James Trimm, Don Hargis, James Tabor [Ebionite who rejects the divinity of Christ] and a few others in the Hebrew Roots movement. James Trimm and Hargis were involved in connection with the Aramaic Bible Society---aka Lamsa---where Hargis and Trimm were both members. Hargis is the source Trimm claimed to obtain his phd from via another Hargis 'project' called the Saint John Chrysostom Theological Seminary, a diploma mill, which actually had deceased faculty listed as, well, faculty. Hargis was apparently more than one person there. He has had many identities and 'projects'. http://www.seekgod.ca/topichrministries.htm#james

Many claim that the the Kaboris Codex has come under attack by the Greek primacy crowd, because they are afraid that the authority of the Greek Scriptures may be undermined. The thinking becomes that since we know that Jesus and his disciples weren't Greek, nothing would have been written or spoken in Greek. There is apparently a lack of knowledge of the many believers listed in the NT who were--dare I say it--Greek, and Roman and other heritage. That thinking though, immediately discounts Luke and the Gospel of Luke. For a further example of Greek believers, including leadership, see Romans 16. Further, the apostle Paul, wrote:


Romans 1:3-5 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; 4. And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead: 5. By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:...

Romans 1:14-17 I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise. 15. So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also. 16. For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

Rom 10:12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.

1Co 1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

Acts 16:1 Then came he to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess, and believed; but his father was a Greek:

Gal 2:3 But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:

Colossians 3:10-11 And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him: 11. Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.

Acts 17:10-12 And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews. 11. These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. 12. Therefore many of them believed; also of honourable women which were Greeks, and of men, not a few.


Many are trying to sell the idea that if you 'hang onto' what they have determined are the Greek words and Greek thoughts in the NT, that you are really hanging onto the paganism of the Greeks, before they knew Christ. The total disregard of the saving grace of Christ even to Greeks, who before Christ followed after other gods, is apparently overturned, because it is not the soul that has sinned, but the language that has sinned and is unclean before God. There appears to be total lack of awareness of the inspiration of the Scriptures and God's ability to preserve what He wanted us to know.

2 Timothy 3:16-17 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17. That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Pagan Greek Versus Holy Hebrew Language Concepts.


Could there have been a Hebrew version of Matthew along with the Greek?. Of course there could, but since there are no original transcripts it becomes a moot point.

Further, if there were such, there is no reason to believe they wouldn't be as "mistranslated" as the Greek, according to some. We do not have a reliable hebrew copy and that is fact. We do have 5,656 manuscripts in greek however, and thanks to that we can see clearly what these contain.

Hebrew is a language that evolved historically from proto Canaanite (1400 bce) into Phoenician (1050 bce) then into paleo, middle, and late Hebrew, which finally ended up becoming the Biblical Hebrew (with vowels) that we find today in the Masoretic text. From there modern words were added, and then once again it evolved into the modern Hebrew that is spoken in Israel today.

There are parts of various books in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) that are written partially in Aramaic (Daniel, Ezra, Jeremiah, Genesis). Aramaic is a language that came out of Canaan, where the people worshipped idols, and was also spoken in pagan Babylon during the captivity. If Hebrew is a Holy language, then why would God mix the language used by a pagan cultures with Hebrew in the Scriptures?

It should be noted that Abraham came from Ur of Chaldees, and then in obedience he left his pagan culture, and crossed over into the land that God had promised him which became Israel. There are loan words which are transliterated from Greek to Aramaic in the book of Daniel (3:5,7,10,15)

The proof that Jewish people spoke more than the Hebrew or Aramaic language even in Jerusalem at the time of Christ is found in Acts 2, at the time of Pentecost.

We should examine the use of languages in first century Judea, listed below (parenthesis) are a few of the possible languages spoken in those regions at that time. Please keep in mind that the list is by no means comprehensive:


Acts 2 (written approx 63 ce)

...3. And tongues as of fire appeared to them, being distributed, and it sat on each one of them.
4 And they were all filled of the Holy Spirit, and began to speak in other languages, as the Spirit gave ability to them to speak.
5 And Jews were living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation of those under the heaven.
6 But this sound occurring, the multitude came together and were confounded, because they each heard them speaking in his own dialect.
7 And all were amazed and marveled, saying to one another, Behold, are not all these, those speaking, Galileans?
8 And how do we hear each in our own dialect in which we were born,
9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites
(Persian/Iranian dialects), and those living in Mesopotamia (Turkish dialects, Syrian, Persian, Akkadian, Aramaic), both Judea (Hebrew,Aramaic,Greek) and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia (Turkish dialects, Greek) 10 both Phrygia and Pamphylia (Turkish dialects,Greek), Egypt (Arabic, Greek, Aramaic), and the regions of Libya over against Cyrene (Latin,Greek, Aramaic, possibly Turkish dialect), and the temporarily residing Romans, (Latin,Greek) both Jews and proselytes,
11 Cretans
(Greek, Aramaic) and Arabians (Arabic, Greek, Aramaic); in our own languages we hear them speaking the great deeds of God?

Would God through His Holy Spirit allow the apostles to speak, in what some Hebrew roots teachers have claimed to be pagan languages, if they truly were according to God’s standards?

If this was the case, wouldn’t it have been easier for the apostles to speak only in Hebrew, and then for God to miraculously have all of the different people who spoke the many other languages, be able to understand what the apostles said in the “Holy language” of Hebrew?

Instead the apostles spoke, and praised God in what some have taught are unclean pagan languages that they claim no self respecting Jew would ever speak.

Perhaps, the most important verses that show the variety of languages being spoken of and read by the people of the time, is found in Luke 23:38, when Christ was crucified.


"And a superscription also was written over him in letters of Greek, and Latin and Hebrew, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS." [KJV]

38 ... letters of Greek
<Hellenikos>,and Latin <Rhomaikos>,and Hebrew <Hebraikos>, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.

Matthew 27:37 records it:

And set up over his head his accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS. [KJV]

And most noteworthy is the record of the event in John 19:19 -22:

19And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was, JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS.
20 This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin.
21 Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.
22 Pilate answered, What I have written I have written. [KJV]


That means it was written in Greek, the language of commerce, Latin, the legal language of the Roman empire and it was written in Hebrew, which was the language of the Temple. "JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS."

Hebrew: Yeshua haNazarei v Melech haYehudim
Greek: Iesous Nazoraios Basileus Ioudaios
Latin: Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum


7067
Promote Greek, deny Christ's Jewish and Hebraic Heritage.

Many within Hebrew Roots claim that since Jesus and the disciples weren't Greek, therefore those who uphold the Greek manuscripts are doing so to discount the "Jewish Hebraic Heritage" of Christ and His disciples including the apostle Paul, in favor of Greek ideas and language. In a nutshell, it's claming there is an antisemitic bias and an attempt to eliminate anything Jewish, if one believes the original writings were penned in Greek. Sort of reverse to their anti-greekism.

Many will claim the Greek bias is found throughout the NT. Some are using the example of Paul in the book of Romans, claiming he never wrote Romans and it says right in it that he didn't. The source verse for this error, is in Romans 16.


Romans 16:21-24 Timotheus my workfellow, and Lucius, and Jason, and Sosipater, my kinsmen, salute you. 22. I Tertius, who wrote this epistle, salute you in the Lord. 23. Gaius mine host, and of the whole church, saluteth you. Erastus the chamberlain of the city saluteth you, and Quartus a brother. 24. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.

In Romans 16, Paul is giving salutations etc. Then Tertius added one line, and then Paul went on with mentioning Gaius "mine host"

Apparently some have never heard of the term 'dictation' and that people such as Tertius were either hired or volunteered to write what Paul dictated. It does not say it was translated by Tertius.


Tertius > G5060 Τέρτιος Tertios Thayer Definition: Tertius = “third” 1) amanuensis of Paul in writing the epistle to the Romans

Websters 1828 Dictionary > Amanuensis AMANUEN'SIS, n. [L. from manus, hand.]
A person whose employment is to write what another dictates.

Amanuensis : stenographer: someone skilled in the transcription of speech (especially dictation) wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Amanuensis : One employed to take dictation, or copy manuscripts; A clerk, secretary or stenographer, or scribe en.wiktionary.org/wiki/amenuensis


It does not say translate what someone dictates. Nor did they read>

Rom 1:14 I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.

Greeks> G1672 Ἕλλην Hellēn
Thayer Definition:
1) a Greek either by nationality, whether a native of the main land or of the Greek islands or colonies
2) in a wider sense the name embraces all nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of the Greeks their own; the primary reference is to a difference of religion and worship

barbarians > G915 βάρβαρος barbaros
Thayer Definition:
1) one whose speech is rude, rough and harsh
2) one who speaks a foreign or strange language which is not understood by another
3) used by the Greeks of any foreigner ignorant of the Greek language, whether mental or moral, with the added notion after the Persian war, of rudeness and brutality. The word is used in the N.T. without the idea of reproachfulness.
Myth: Better to eat swine flesh than to speak Greek.

Some Hebrew roots teachers have circulated the “myth” that the Jews of that day believed it was better to eat swine flesh, than to speak Greek. I guess the apostles never got the memo on that, nor did the Holy Spirit, or maybe there was a shortage of swine flesh at that time, because as they were being led by the Holy Spirit, they spoke Greek as one of the many languages. This is detailed in the passage recorded in Acts. Keeping in mind, that since Greek was established as the common language, and the language of trade since the rule of Alexander almost four centuries before the time of Christ in 332 bce, that many others throughout the Roman empire also spoke and understood Greek as well.

It should be noted that Jesus spoke Aramaic while on the Cross, and in some other passages found in the New Testament. If Hebrew was the Holy language, why would Jesus choose to speak Aramaic in these passages, and especially in Mark 15:34? It is written in Scripture, that when He addressed the Father from the Cross, He cried out “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani” which is clearly in the Aramaic language.

Jesus most likely conversed in Greek or possibly Latin with Pilate at His trial. He also spoke in a Hebraic language (some scholars say Aramaic) to Paul on the road to Damascus in the book of Acts. Paul, who wrote thirteen or fourteen books of the New Testament spoke Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, probably Latin (Roman citizen), and because he lived in Tarsus at an early age, he possibly would have spoken a local dialect which would probably be related to modern Turkish. Some scholars have theorized that Paul may even have spoken a few other languages or dialects that he would have learned while traveling abroad establishing the assemblies.

There is an argument sometimes presented that Hebrew is the language of God, because of an errant belief that He wrote the Ten Commandments in Hebrew with His own finger into the tablets made of stone. The Ten commandments were not written in what we consider Hebrew, and we are able to discern this due to the time frame when they would have been written. The language of that time was proto Canaanite which has been definitively established through archaeological finds.

It is theorized that proto Canaanite is the language that Abraham spoke, and the language that God may have used to converse with him. (approx 1800 bce) The Ten Commandments were given before the five books of Moses (Torah), which is dated approximately 1500-1400 bce when proto Canaanite was still in effect as a language. Other languages used by many of the idol worshipping cultures of the area were also derived from it such as the dialects of the Amorites, Hittites, Hivites, Perizites and Jebusites, and then Greek was developed from the Canaanite/Phoenician alphabet later around 750 bce. If the Ten Commandments had been written in Hebrew as we know it, then Moses and the children of Israel would have not been able to understand what was written. This is because it is a different alphabet due to the fact that Hebrew script, which is a derivative of proto Canaanite,*only came into being in the 9th century bce, a full six centuries later....

People need to start proving all things. So many are bing led astray because they do not know the Scriptures well enough in order to stand true in Christ. Smiley-danger

They become easy prey for those such as Hebrew Roots who are dangling the carrot of "the true faith", or getting closer to God, get rid of greek paganism, get rid of your western gentile mind, etc etc. Th_thlies

The truth is, it has always been about Jesus Christ and a relationship with Him.
6788

2 Timothy 4:2-4 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. 3. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

15249

Princess of Heaven

Hsa 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
the more i go along this journey, the more i realize we have to know scripture, more than ever before....i have failed miserably in this, however i pray i will do better and test all things that come my way...
(05-15-2009 04:03 PM)Princess of Heaven Wrote: [ -> ]Hsa 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
the more i go along this journey, the more i realize we have to know scripture, more than ever before....i have failed miserably in this, however i pray i will do better and test all things that come my way...

After tripping over all kinds of doctrines, traditions, and practices to "improve" my relationship with God, the most important thing I discovered is that the Gospel is simple. The truths of the Bible are clear and unmuddied. To follow Christ is to love Him and serve Him as He gives us the ability by His Spirit. Other than that, all the doctrines and theologies that man dreams up are designed to trip you up, not help you run the race towards Christ.2020a
(05-15-2009 04:03 PM)Princess of Heaven Wrote: [ -> ]Hsa 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
the more i go along this journey, the more i realize we have to know scripture, more than ever before....i have failed miserably in this, however i pray i will do better and test all things that come my way...

Sign0098

That verse has been said many time to me in response to people getting caught in deception. And it is absolutely imperative to study the Scriptures. It is truly the Sword of the Spirit, and without it we cannot refute the errors that must be refuted. It takes time, and there are areas I feel confident God will bring to mind things I have learned. Other times I feel a red flag and don't know what the issue is, or how it is wrong, but I do know that with prayer and seeking God's wisdom He will direct our thoughts to where we need to get the Scriptural answers. There is always an answer. Reading

I am so glad you growing in Christ and in wisdom and knowledge of Him.


Th_prraisethelord
The NT was written in the Greek as it was the lingua franca of the Eastern Roman Empire. Putting it in Greek made it accessible to milliojns of people (literally. the population of the Roman Empire was 60 million.

So GOd knew what he was doing. He wanted his word spread so put in in the main laguage of the area.

Equating Greek Language with Greek mindset is over done. If they think this is a valid principle maybe they should give up speaking in modern english, the language of the worlds commerce and science. After all the world is opposed to God, always has been, and English is the number one world language, and its thought forms permatea ungodly science and commernce !!!

Clearly HR is idolatrous here.

another point. Jesus condemned the admixture of humam tradition wherby the Pharisees overlaid the scriptures (separate and distinct from the language it was in, after all He used the Septuagint).

I am sure he would have condemned the Talmud etc. So the religion of judaism is not the faith of Abraham and the religion of the church (we have doine the same thing) is not the faith of the apostles.

that should mean, if i argue it right, that the HR people are the ones who have forsaken their hebraic roots, rejecting a one man and his god faith as abraham had prefering insteadf, as the carnal mind does prefer, laws, rules and ordinances

after all faith is so intangible, you feel you can never know where you stand swith it. but law, well it is clear cut and everything is nailed down. faith then is vague and unclear,

unless you have it :D
I hope you spotted the irony in the last post.

these people are exploiting the fact that languages can NEVER be translated word for word. But then they dont have to be. if adequate translation can not be done then so englishman can ever talk to a frenchman etc

HR is waving a straw man about (ie a misrepresentation of how language and translation works).

I doubt very much that they are honest about this
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's