http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment...400568.ece
isnt this odd? an atheist who will not believe the gospel but thinks africans should believe it. It seems absurd to me. Either he refuses to take the medicine he himself recommends, or he thinks that africans shoulds adopt something they, like he, does not believe, which is absurd
My perspective is that I was an atheist myself, until I was converted by that Damascus road type experience I mentioned at age 19. But even then, at that age, my thinking purported to be reasoned. Purported, I say, for atheism is irrational and the very words the Holy Spirit said to me that dark night when He met me was "YOU FRAUD"
As for the fear that permeates tribal religion, this is one thing I know about from being a member of a missionary church. It is proof that the idea that the natives are happy and should be left alone is absolute nonsense.
The idea of the noble savage, an innocent in nature uncorrupted by civililzation was championed by Rousseau in the late 18th century. It was nonsense, but i recently saw on a tv doco that this was one of the ideas beind the hippies. I was too young for that generation, but i was 10 years old in 1968, and I remember thinking at the that hippies were self righteous fools.
I did think it odd that the author should recommend christianity yet not believe it himself, but maybe God can use this to save him
This is odd, and it reminds me of my Israeli skinhead friend who knows the Old Testament by heart, yet is an atheist. In Israel they teach the Tanakh to kids in public schools (anyone trying it in this country would be lynched) because it is their history, and my friend enjoys answering queries from an American Christian about the OT. I hope God will help him regain his faith because God could really use him to teach people about the Tanakh.
Wow, I wasn't aware that Israeli schools polluted the Tanakh teaching with the Talmud. It makes perfect sense that this would result in unbelieving students.