|
Possibly Jonah's big fish?
|
|
04-28-2012, 11:07 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Possibly Jonah's big fish?
(04-24-2012 12:01 PM)Vic Wrote: What amazing pictures! And the Scriptures are not specific as you noted. It is entirely feasible that could have been the type of 'great fish'. I think that whoever translated ketos as "whale" in the NT context wasn't aware that whales are mammals. (The taxonomic name Cetacea for the whale order is derived from ketos.) In the 17th century a lot of if not most people thought whales were fish. One thing I think is funny is that so many scientists (though not all of them) want to "prove" that God doesn't exist, but all of the various sciences repeatedly demonstrate that His Word is true. When I see a humongous fish capable of swallowing a human whole, I think of Jonah--and indirectly, Jesus in the tomb for three days, as you pointed out. I think God uses my love of science and nature to remind me that His Word is the Truth, and I cannot possibly be the only individual on earth to whom He speaks through science. HOSTIS HVMANI GENERIS ![]() VISUALIZE WORLD WAR |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Possibly Jonah's big fish? - YYZ Skinhead - 04-24-2012, 12:32 AM
RE: Possibly Jonah's big fish? - Vic - 04-24-2012, 12:01 PM
RE: Possibly Jonah's big fish? - YYZ Skinhead - 04-28-2012 11:07 AM
RE: Possibly Jonah's big fish? - Vic - 04-28-2012, 11:54 AM
RE: Possibly Jonah's big fish? - YYZ Skinhead - 04-28-2012, 05:37 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Help

![[Image: 2vtwd1i.jpg]](http://i46.tinypic.com/2vtwd1i.jpg)


