Shem Tov or Shem Tob Matthew--The Hebrew Matthew

[Vic]

Quote: Carl: Following is a listing of some linguistic and Biblical authorities who maintain or support a belief in a Hebrew origin of the New Testament:

As can be seen, most involved in the list of scholars reject Jesus Christ, which for some isn't an issue is it?

But for those who claim Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord, it is a big deal to wave the flag of scholarship concerning the Scriptures.

So a quick perusal on the 'net for the source of the "list of scholars" comes originally from:

The Remnant of YHWH
PO BOX 2453
Abilene, Texas 79604

http://www.remnantofyhwh.com/Hebrew%20Origin%20NT.htm

Hebrew/Aramaic Origin of the New Testament ,Textual analysis and scholarship supporting an original Hebrew New Testament

Or

http://groups.google.ru/group/TheNarrowG...a-articles

Yahweh’s New Covenant Assembly (YNCA) PO Box 50, Kingdom City, Missouri

We'll use the Remnant of YHWH for simplicity sake:

What do they believe and teach:
The Revelation of Jesus> The Shocking Truth Exposed > "...So accepted is the name “Jesus” that no one dares question its authenticity. But if we actually did research this name, would we find this to be His original Name?...Ps 33:17 says, "H'SUS -Jesus/the Horse is a vain hope for safety!"

..If we can prove that the Messiah of Israyl’s name is NOT “Jesus”, isn’t it time to repent and learn the Truth? ...

http://www.remnantofyhwh.com/Jesus.htm

Their site, including mirror site of twowitnessministries.com shows heavy conspiracy stuff, bible codes, they are the only true believers aka remnant, sacred namers--which incidentally is poor scholarship again, and they link directly to the sacred name site eliyah.com for their chat etc.

I see no point in presenting much more. It takes little discernment to reject them as a source for anything.


But that's my opinion.

You, Carl, apparently find their information valid at the very least, and the question would be, Why?