What's the True Name of God?

[Vic]

(07-20-2010 12:50 AM)zeke25 Wrote:  [size=large]Dear Rose of Shushan,

Thank you for weighing in. You are an administrator. I request that this thread, at least since I joined it on 7/17/10, be moved to its proper place under "Christianity". It is an affront to Christ for this discussion to be taking place under the heretical HRM section.

Zeke as a new member you are being more than a little overbearing. You appear to think you are hear to teach everyone when in fact there is no proof you know anything about what you are refuting. For you to be allowed to post a 14 part article---even long time members would not be allowed to do such a thing---would be considered spamming. The forum isnt a platform to merely come and disseminate your writings.

The proper place for this topic is just exactly where it is because not only is it relative to HR, HR crosses over into Christianity. So it affects all believers.

[qupte]God takes His name very seriously. I would have started it there myself, but was informed that as a newbie I cannot start a thread until I have made 50 posts. But then the instructions request that I start a thread to introduce myself. Ambiguous? Actually, I tried to start a thread on this subject, but it was removed because I broke the rules. [/quote]

The issue of starting threads and even the issue of starting one to introduce yourself is discussed right in the rules so there is no confusion or contradiction. Your attitude reeks of arrogance and contempt for the rules that had to be put in place because of just such attitudes. There were none for many months when the forum was started. If you have not read them--read them. It's required so you do not break them.

http://www.seekgod.ca/forum/showthread.php?tid=560
http://www.seekgod.ca/forum/showthread.php?tid=229

Quote:Furthermore, I was invited, more than once to refrain from posting the full teaching I have prepared. If I were to post it, the answer to your question is there. It is not my fault. I have offered.

You do not need a thesis to answer the few questions and specific points people are directing towards you. If you cannot answer just say so. It has nothing to do with telling you in polite way that you are not going to be posting your articles in their entirety. If you want to address a few points fine.

Quote:Yes, I am angry with the writer of this article of many false names for the Self-existing One. S/he presents a teaching and misinforms you. At best, the misinformation is due to sloppy study habits. At worst, it is purposeful deception.

So far all you have managed to do is make derogatory and false statements concerning the author of that article. So far all you have presented has been refuted by actual language issues etc. Do not continue in the vein of arrogant putdowns. You have proven nothing except admitting you have an agenda--which doesn't really impress. You want to have a discussion--discuss by specific points. Buit don't come here and continue the way you have been doing.


...

Quote:were required to lie and not tell you. I have proof of this in my teaching. But at least two people in this forum do not think that you or others in this forum has the mental stamina to read and understand this teaching; that is why I have been encouraged not to give it.

Zeke, no one said people didnt have the mental stamina to read and understand. I have many lengthy research articles that thousands read and understand. The issue was that you have come on here and were starting to present a 14 section posting??? and expect people to just lap it up because you wrote it and it is "correct". You obviously think you have the only truth on the matter...and thats called being gnostic.

You were being given an out without breaking the rules, by being told people would not want to read it. That's also just common on forums--people don't want books. They want to discuss. And when it is necessary to refute someone we might do lengthy posts because it usually doctrinally related. But that isnt something a newb has earned.

Quote:What did God say in Exodus 3:14? Oops, I can't tell you. I don't want to tax your mental capabilities. I've written too much. Not my sentiment, but the sentiment of other administrators.

Do not continue to demean members and readers. You say anything like this again and it will not go well at all.

Quote:BTW, I think that God's true children, that love our Father with all their heart, can endure the entire teaching and be enlightened by the Holy Ghost while doing so. But those who desire a fast food religion will not be interested and they will never know what has really been said in Exodus 3:14. The proof of this is that they haven’t known, until now, what Exodus 3:15 has said. And BTW again, the Scriptures can guide us to the proper pronunciation of His forever name.

So far you are being proven wrong on your interpretation. It has nothing to do with needing to be enlightened by you. It has to do with understanding the Scriptures and since you want to use language issues--understanding those things also. All I see that you have proven is that you think you are the only one to know anything and it is obvious you aren't really here to discuss anything unless everyone agrees with you. And so far you appear to be wrong.

Quote:If I haven't offended you, then post again. I will tell you what has really been said in Exodus 3:14, even though teachings have come out for years and claimed that two candy bars are really three. Not!

I would recommend that you reply individually to each poster who has commented and answer what has been asked of you directly and stop hedging and being indignant that you are not going to be allowed to post your article writings here. Instead keep on point with what is being asked of you.