|
What's the True Name of God?
|
|
04-15-2011, 04:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-15-2011 05:04 PM by sari83.)
Post: #56
|
|||
|
|||
RE: What's the True Name of God?
(04-15-2011 04:12 PM)YYZ Skinhead Wrote:(04-15-2011 03:13 PM)sari83 Wrote: Oh, I thought Tetragrammaton, was the Greek word used to describe the four letters of God's name, YHWH. Oh, ok. I'm sure that's not how God intended His name to be used. Vic: You see Sarah, many of your posts permeate gnostic concepts or under Christian doctrine, heresy. You seem to be tossed to and fro by the things you post and go after every wind of doctrine, either with or without understanding why it is incorrect based on the Scriptures. Sari83: Can you give me some specific examples of unscriptural gnostic concepts? I would genuinely like to know. Vic: Sarah you never seem to be satisfied with the Truth as found in the Scriptures. You always appear to want that extra bit of info that comes from outside the Scriptures and then apply it and try to make the Scriptures fit that doctrine. Sari83: In some of your articles you reference sources outside the scriptures, i.e. talmud, zohar.... Is it not ok to reference current and/or historical documents? I read creation science articles that affirm Noah's flood, young earth, etc. I didn't need those factual confirmations because I already believed, but truth is truth. If there is a witness to truth that exists, it's because God has allowed it to exist. Vic: You appear to feel you are here to teach everyone what you have learned in '9' or 2 or 3 yrs depending which post we refer back to, as sheep had pointed out to you. The contradictions, as noted by Mary and Rose, are throughout all the threads you post to. End quote- Sari83: From my point of view, Mary and Rose were nit-picking at my words because they must not have liked what I expressed in a particular post. When I'm reading someone's post I don't look for miniscule errors to try and discredit the bigger picture of what the person was saying. I am here on this forum because I would like to hear the perspectives of other believers, and some of the topics are controversial. I would like to learn all sides of the spectrum. We have to admit that each person is an individual who see's and understands things based on there own life experiences. Vic: That is why time and again you have posted error, and it has been refuted; you have sourced heretical writings and doctrine and posted them, and they have been refuted, and so on, but it does not seem to make an impact on you at all. You just move forward on to the next item on your 'list'. I just get the feeling that you are so set in your beliefs which you developed somewhat on your own and also in the forums like Followers of Yah, and nazarite.net, that you have this mission to convey all the heresies from there and never hear anything we might say to show it all for what it is. False doctrine. I don't want to offend you Sarah, but I want to be honest with you and say what I think is important for you to hear. I hope you can receive it. Sari83: How is commenting on topics that are open for discussion on this forum, conveying heresies? Why even open up some of these topics of discussion? Is it so that people can be reemed for not welcoming the not-so-gentle criticism of those advanced members on this forum? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Help



