Another reason to avoid the KJV

[sheep wrecked]

What makes you think that this verse was not tampered with if you factor in all the errors that you have promoted exist? Do we actually have the true Word of God?


Hi Sheep Wrecked,

There are two very good reasons.

1) The AKJV Bible was translated on a strict “word for word” basis; they also used
added words to aid in translational differences identified by [italics] to not accidentally corrupt God’s Word.

2) The translators in 1603 did not have preconceived ideas as to what God had intended;
as the more ‘modern versions’ do; which has corrupted many modern versions of the Bible.


The problem with people today is that they go about to trying to establish their brand of truth.
“The Truth” simply IS, and all that’s needed is for it to be revealed or exposed. It takes the Holy Spirit residing on the inside of a person for them to believe it.


What makes you think Philip 2:6 was not tampered with?
All you have to do is read Philip 2:6 in the different translations to see that it has indeed been tampered with; illustrating # 3 corruption errors.

Always seek the truth, and you will be better off by it.

God bless
Ed J
[/quote]

Ed,

Once again, you have diverted your answer from what I asked. Do you have any assurance that Phil 2:6 is actually inspired Scripture based on your 4 point thesis that the KJV is full of error? If you actually believe those 4 points, then the KJV is not "anointed" as you call it and you have no way of knowing if any verse, any word, or any "theology" of the KJV is correct. It does not matter if you agree that it was translated on a word for word basis because your 4 point position is a loaded gun, shooting the KJV full of holes.